35.1 Lagrangian mechanics
In the Lagrangian formalism, instead of a phase space of positions and momenta , one considers just the position (or configuration) space . Instead of a Hamiltonian function , one has:
Definition (Lagrangian)
The Lagrangian L for a classical mechanical system with configuration space is a function
Given diferentiable paths in the configuration space defined by functions
which we will write in terms of their position and velocity vectors as
one can define a functional on the space of such paths:
Definition (Action)
The action for a path is
The fundamental principle of classical mechanics in the Lagrangian formalism is that classical trajectories are given by critical points of the action functional. These may correspond to minima of the action (so this is sometimes called the “principle of least action”), but one gets classical trajectories also for critical points that are not minima of the action. One can define the appropriate notion of critical point as follows:
Definition (Critical point for S)
A path is a critical point of the functional
where
is a smooth family of paths parametrized by an interval , with
We’ll now ignore analytical details and adopt the physicist’s interpretation of S as the first-order change in due to an infinitesimal change in the path.
When satisfy a certain diferential equation, the path will be a critical point and thus a classical trajectory:
Theorem (Euler-Lagrange equations)
One has
for all variations of with endpoints and fixed
for . These are called the Euler-Lagrange equations.
Proof. Ignoring analytical details, the Euler-Lagrange equations follow from the following calculations, which we’ll just do for , with the generalization to higher d straightforward. We are calculating the first-order change in due to an infinitesimal change
But
and, using integration by parts
so
If we keep the endpoints fixed so , then for solutions to
the integral will be zero for arbitrary variations
As an example, a particle moving in a potential will be described by a Lagrangian
for which the Euler-Lagrange equations will be
This is just Newton’s second law, which says that the force due to a potential is equal to the mass times the acceleration of the particle.
Given a Lagrangian classical mechanical system, one would like to be able to find a corresponding Hamiltonian system that will give the same equations of motion. To do this, we proceed by defining (for each configuration coordinate a corresponding momentum coordinate by
Then, instead of working with trajectories characterized at time t by
we would like to instead use
where and identify this (for example at as the phase space of the conventional Hamiltonian formalism.
The transformation
between position-velocity and phase space is known as the Legendre transform, and in good cases (for instance when is quadratic in all the velocities) it is an isomorphism. In general though, this is not an isomorphism, with the Legendre transform often taking position-velocity space to a lower dimensional subspace of phase space. Such cases are not unusual and require a much more complicated formalism, even as classical mechanical systems (this subject is known as “constrained Hamiltonian dynamics”). One important example we will study in chapter 46 is that of the free electromagnetic field, with equations of motion the Maxwell equations. In that case the configuration space coordinates are the components of the vector potential, with the problem arising because the Lagrangian does not depend on
Besides a phase space, for a Hamiltonian system one needs a Hamiltonian function. Choosing
will work, provided the relation
can be used to solve for the velocities and express them in terms of the momentum variables. In that case, computing the diferential of h one finds (for = 1, the generalization to higher is straightforward)
So one has
but these are precisely Hamilton’s equations since the Euler-Lagrange equations imply
While the Legendre transform method given above works in some situations, more generally and more abstractly, one can pass from the Lagrangian to the Hamiltonian formalism by taking as phase space the space of solutions of the Euler-Lagrange equations. This is sometimes called the “covariant phase space”, and it can often concretely be realized by fixing a time and parametrizing solutions by their initial conditions at such a . One can also go directly from the action to a sort of Poisson bracket on this covariant phase space (this is called the “Peierls bracket”). For a general Lagrangian, one can pass to a version of the Hamiltonian formalism either by this method or by the method of Hamiltonian mechanics with constraints. Only for a special class of Lagrangians though will one get a non-degenerate Poisson bracket on a linear phase space and recover the usual properties of the standard Hamiltonian formalism.
来源与版本
正文:英文 · OCR 机器稿 · 待校对
核对状态:OCR 机器稿 · 待校对
原书 PDF · 印刷页 368、369、370、371、372、373、374、375、376、377、378
来源版本:2025-10-20
来源 PDF SHA-256:5a1941b2443b54d5db3d055f1e5ba390429b7a728475258017aaac87ee85a837
OCR 来源 SHA-256:4d92662ff76fdf74e5f8a5c1d0f4f1f79f9dd3f6bb5dd5a02ec8264c7718a92d
OCR 产物 SHA-256:4d92662ff76fdf74e5f8a5c1d0f4f1f79f9dd3f6bb5dd5a02ec8264c7718a92d