中文

-Vectors and -forms

Let be a vector space of dimension with basis and dual basis Since the spaces and are both one-dimensional, the -vector

forms a basis of , while the -form

is a basis of . These will sometimes be referred to as volume elements associated with this basis.

Show that every non-zero -vector is the volume element associated with some basis of .

Given a basis , every -vector has a unique expansion

where the epsilon-symbols, or Levi–Civita symbols, and are defined by

The epsilon-symbols are clearly antisymmetric in any pair of indices.

Show that any -form has a unique expansion

Every -vector and -form has tensor components proportional to the epsilon-symbols,

and setting we have

Transformation laws of -vectors and -forms

The transformation matrix appearing in Eq. (7.26) satisfie

Proof

If then the left-hand side is the usual expansion of the determinant of the matrix as a sum of products of its elements taken from different rows and columns with appropriate signs, while the right-hand side is From the antisymmetry of the epsilon symbol in any pair of indices and we have

and the whole expression is antismmetric in any pair of indices . In particular, it vanishes if . Hence is any permutation of ) such that then both sides ofEq. (8.23) are multiplied by the sign ofthe permutation , while if any pair of indices are equal, both sides of the equation vanish.

If is any -vector, then from the law of transformation of tensor components,

Setting , the factor is seen to transform as

If we arrive at the transformation law of volume elements,

A similar formula to Eq. (8.23) holds for the inverse matrix ,

and the transformation law for an -form is

Prove Eqs. Eq. (8.26)–Eq. (8.28).

Note, from Eqs. Eq. (8.23) and Eq. (8.26), that the epsilon-symbols do not transform as components of tensors under general basis transformations. They do however transform as tensors with respect to the restricted set ofunimodular transformations, having . In particular, for cartesian tensors they transform as tensors provided only proper orthogonal transformations, rotations, are permitted. The term ‘tensor density’ is sometimes used to refer to entities that include determinant factors like those in Eq. (8.23) and Eq. (8.26), while scalar quantities that transform like or in Eq. (8.24) and Eq. (8.27) are referred to as ‘densities’.

Oriented vector spaces

Two bases and are said to have the same orientation if the transformation matrix in Eq. (7.26) has positive determinant, otherwise they are said to be oppositely oriented. Writing iff and have the same orientation, it is straightforward to show that is an equivalence relation and divides the set of all bases on into two equivalence classes, called orientations. A vector space together with a choice oforientation is called an oriented vector space. Any basis belonging to the selected orientation will be said to be positively oriented, while oppositely oriented bases will be called negatively oriented.

Euclidean three-dimensional space together with choice ofa right-handed orthonormal basis {. . } is an oriented vector space. The orientation consists of the se of all bases related to , , through a positive determinant transformation. A left-handed set of axes has opposite orientation since the basis transformation will involve a reflection, having negative determinant.

Let be an -dimensional vector space. Denote the set of all volume ele ments on by and . Two non-zero -vectors and can be said to have the same orientation if with . This clearly provides an equivalence relation on , dividing it into two non-intersecting equivalence classes. A selection of one of these two classes is an alternative way of specifying an orientation on a vector space for we may stipulate that a basis has positive orientation if with for all volume elements in the chosen class. By Eqs. Eq. (8.24) and Eq. (8.25), this is equivalent to dividing the set of bases on into two classes.

Now let be an oriented -dimensional real inner product space having index where is any positively oriented orthonormal frame such that

then is the number of 1’s and the number of 1’s among the . As pseudo-orthogona transformations all have determinant 1, those relating positively oriented orthonorma frames must have 1. Hence, by Eq. (8.25), the volume element is independent of the choice of positively oriented orthonormal basis and is entirely determined by the inner product and the orientation on

By Eq. (8.22), the components of the volume element with respect to any positively oriented orthonormal basis are

With respect to an arbitrary positively oriented basis , not necessarily orthonormal, the components of are, by Eqs. (7.30) and Eq. (8.23),

Take note that these are the components ofthe volume element determined by the origina orthonormal basis expressed with respect to the new basis, not the components of the volume element determined by the new basis. It is possible to arrive at a formula for the components on the right-hand side of Eq. (8.29) that is independent of the transformation matrix . Consider the transformation of components of the metric tensor, defined by

which can be written in matrix form

On taking determinants

and subsituting in Eq. (8.29) we have

Eliminating the primes, it follows that the components of the volume element defined by the inner product can be written in an arbitrary positively oriented basis as

On lowering the indices of we have

Since the sign of the determinant is equal to ( 1) we have, in any positively oriented basis,

Show that the components of the -form defined by a positively oriented o.n. basis are

Epsilon-symbol identities

The epsilon-symbols satisfy a number of fundamental identities, the most general of which is

where the generalized -symbol is defined by

Total contraction of Eq. (8.33) over all indices gives

Contracting Eq. (8.33) over the first 1 indices gives

for if each term in the summation vanishes since in every summand either one pair ofsuperscripts or one pair ofsubscripts must be equal, while if the expression is a sum of ! terms each of value +1.

The most general contraction identity arising from Eq. (8.34) is

where the -symbol on the right-hand side can be expressed in terms of Kronecke

deltas,

a sum terms in which the indices run over every permutation of

In three dimensions we have

The last three identities are particularly useful in cartesian tensors where the summation convention is used on repeated subscripts, giving

For example, the vector product of two vectors and is defined as the vector whose components are given by

The vector identity

follows from

Show the identity