If and are distributions of order on , then clearly and are distributions of this order for all . Thus is a vector space.
Prove that is linear and continuous. Similarly for
The product of two distributions is not a distribution. For example, if we were to define , this is not linear in . However, if is a function on and is a distribution of order then can be defined as a distribution of order , by setting
since for all ). Note that need not be a test function for this construction – it works even if the function does not have compact support.
If is a regular distribution on , then . For
The operation of multiplying the regular distribution by is equivalent to simply multiplying the corresponding density function by . In this case need only be a locally integrable function.
The distribution defined in Example 12.2 is a distribution of order zero, since it is well-defined on the space of continuous test functions, . For any continuous function we have
Thus
In terms of the ‘delta function’ this identity is commonly written as
since
For the delta function at an arbitrary point , these identities are replaced by
Setting results in the useful identities
Extend these identities to the -dimensional delta function,
Differentiation of distributions
Let be a regular distribution where is a differentiable function. Standard results in real analysis ensure that the derivative is a locally integrable function. Let be any test function from . Using integration by parts
since . We can extend this identity to general distributions, by defining the derivative of a distribution of order on to be the distribution of order given by
The derivative of a regular distribution then corresponds to taking the derivative of the density function. Note that the order of the distribution increases on differentiation, for implies that ). In particular, if is a distribution of order 0 then is a distribution of order 1.
To prove that is continuous (linearity is obvious), we use the fact that in the definition of convergence to order of a sequence of functions it is required that all derivatives up to and including order converge uniformly on a compact subset of
. In particular, for all , and
It follows that every distribution of any order is infinitely differentiable.
If is a distribution of order greater or equal to 0 on , we may define its partiall derivatives in a similar way,
As for distributions on , any such distribution is infinitely differentiable. For higher derivatives it follows that
Show that
Set to be the Heaviside step function
This is evidently a locally integrable function, and generates a regular distribution . For any test function
Thus we have the distributional equation, valid only over ,
This is commonly written in terms of ‘functions’ as
Intuitively, the step at is ‘infinitely steep’.
The derivative of the delta distribution is defined as the distribution of order 1, which may be applied to any test function
Expressed in terms of the delta function, this reads
for an arbitrary function differentiable on a neighbourhood of the origin . Continuing to higher derivatives, we have
or in Dirac’s notation
For the th derivative,
For the product of a differentiable function and a distribution we obtain the usua Leibnitz rule,
for
From Examples 12.3 and 12.5 we have that
and
Hence
We can also derive this equation by manipulating the delta function in natural ways,
Verify the identity by applying both sides as distributions to an arbitrary test function ().
Change of variable in -functions
In applications of the mathematics of delta functions it is common to consider ‘functions’ such as . While this is not an operation that generalizes to all distributions, there is a sense in which we can define this concept for the delta distribution for many functions . Firstly, if is a continuous monotone increasing function such that and we adopt Dirac’s notation then, assuming integrals can be manipulated by the standard rules for change of variable,
If is monotone decreasing then the range of integration is inverted to resulting in a sign change. The general formula for a monotone function of either direction, having a unique zero at , is
Symbolically, we may write
or in terms of distributions,
Essentially this equation can be taken as the definition of the distribution . Setting , it follows that is an even function
If two test functions and agree on an arbitrary neighbourhood of the origin then
Hence the distribution can be regarded as being a distribution on the space of functions , since essentially it only samples values of any test function in a neighbourhood of the origin. Thus it is completely consistent to write
This just reiterates the idea that for all
If has zeros at . and is a monotone function in the neighbourhood of each , then a change of variable to gives, on restricting integration to a smal
neighbourhood of each zero,
Hence
or equivalently
The function is locally monotone at both its zeros , provided . In a small neighbourhood of the function may be approximated by the monotone increasing function , while in a neighbourhood of it is monotone decreasing and approximated by . Thus
in agreement with Eq. (12.9).
Problems
In the sense of convergence defined in Problem 12.4 show that if then
In the distributional sense, show that we have the following convergences:
Evaluate
(a) for .
(b)
Show the following identities:
(c)
Show that for a monotone function () such tha
For a general function that is monotone on a neighbourhood of all its zeros, find a genera formula for the distribution
Show the identities
and
Hence show that is a solution of the partial differential equation