There is no natural way to define the integral of a scalar function over a compact region . For, if where is the domain of a coordinate chart the multiple integral
will have a different expression in a second chart such tha
As seen above, -forms absorb a Jacobian determinant in their coordinate transformation, and it turns out that these are the ideal objects for integration. However, it is necessary that the manifold be orientable so that the absolute value of the Jacobian occurring in the integral transformation law can be omitted.
Let be an -dimensional oriented differentiable manifold, and a positively oriented chart. On we can write where . The support of an -form is defined as the closure of the set on which ,
If has compact support contained in , and on we define its integral over to be
where is commonly written in place of is a second positively oriented chart also containing the support of and we have by the change of variable formula in multiple integration
since
and the Jacobian determinant is everywhere positive. The definition of the integral is there fore independent of the coordinate chart, provided the support lies within the domain of the chart.
For an arbitrary -form with compact support and atlas , assumed to be locally finite, let be a partition of unity subordinate to the open covering . Evidently
and each of the summands has compact support contained in . We define the integra of over to be
Prove that is a linear operator,
If is a differential -form with compact support on and is a regula embedding of a -dimensional manifold in (see Section 15.4), define the integral of on to be
The right-hand side is well-defined since is a differential -form on with compact support, since is a homeomorphism from to in the relative topology with respect to .
Problems
Show that the definition of the integral of an -form over a manifold given in Eq. (17.1) is independent of the choice of partition of unity subordinate to