In the present section we will be concerned with the characteristic classes associated with a real vector bundle.

11.4.1 Pontrjagin classes

Let be a real vector bundle over an -dimensional manifold with . If is endowed with the fibre metric, we may introduce orthonormal frames at each fibre. The structure group may be reduced to from . Since the generators of are skew symmetric, the field strength of is also skew symmetric. A skew-symmetric matrix is not diagonalizable by an element of a subgroup of . It is, however, reducible to block diagonal form as

where the second diagonalization is achieved only by an element of . If is odd, the last diagonal element is set to zero. For example, the generator of generating rotations around the -axis is

The total Pontrjagin class is defined by

From the skew symmetry , it follows that

Therefore, is an even function in . The expansion of is

where is a polynomial of order and is an element of . We note that for either or .1

Let us diagonalize as

where , being the eigenvalues of . The sign has been chosen to simplify the Euler class defined here. The generating function of is given by

where

In (11.73) only even powers appear, reflecting the skew symmetry. Each Pontrjagin class is computed from (11.73) as

To write in terms of the curvature two-form , we first note that

It then follows that

中

The reader should verify that

It is easy to guess that the Pontrjagin classes are written in terms of Chern classes. Since Chern classes are defined only for complex vector bundles, we must complexify the fibre of so that complex numbers make sense. The resulting vector bundle is denoted by . Let be a skew-symmetric real matrix. We find that

from which it follows that

Let be a four-dimensional Riemannian manifold. When the orthonormal frame is employed, the structure group of the tangent bundle may be reduced to . Let be the curvature two-form should not be confused with the scalar curvature). For the tangent bundle, it is common to write instead of . We have

Each Pontrjagin class is given by

Although vanishes as a differential form, we need it in the next subsection to compute the Euler class.

11.4.2 Euler classes

Let be a 2l-dimensional orientable Riemannian manifold and let be the tangent bundle of . We denote the curvature by . It is always possible to reduce the structure group of down to by employing an orthonormal frame. The Euler class of is defined by the square root of the 4l-form ,

Both sides should be understood as functions of a matrix and not of the curvature , since vanishes identically. However, thus defined is a -form and, indeed, gives a volume element of . If is an odd-dimensional manifold we define , see later.

Let and consider the tangent bundle . From example 7.14, we find the curvature two-form,

where we have noted that . Although as a differential form, we compute it to find the Euler form. We have

from which we read off

It is interesting to note that

which is the Euler characteristic of , see section 2.4. This is not just a coincidence. Let us take another convincing example, a torus . Since admits a flat connection, the curvature vanishes identically. It then follows that and . These are special cases of the Gauss-Bonnet theorem,

for a compact orientable manifold . If is odd dimensional both and vanish, see (6.39).

In general, the determinant of a skew-symmetric matrix is a square of a polynomial called the Pfaffian ,2

We show that the Pfaffian is given by

where the phase has been chosen for later convenience. We first note that a skew-symmetric matrix can be block diagonalized by an element of as

It is easy to see that

To compute , we note that the non-vanishing terms in (11.85) are of the form . Moreover, there are ways of changing the suffices as , such as

and permutations of the pairs of indices, for example,

Hence, we have

Thus, we conclude that a block diagonal matrix satisfies

To show that (11.84) is true for any skew-symmetric matrices (not necessarily block diagonal) we use the following lemma, 3

If for , we have , hence

We finally find for a skew-symmetric matrix .

Note that is invariant but changes sign under an improper rotation (det ) of .

Show that the determinant of an odd-dimensional skew-symmetric matrix vanishes. This is why we put for an odd-dimensional manifold.

The Euler class is defined in terms of the curvature as

The generating function is obtained by taking

The phase has been chosen to simplify the RHS.

Let be a four-dimensional orientable manifold. The structure group of is SO(4), see example 11.5. The Euler class is obtained from (11.88) as

This is in agreement with the result of example 11.5. The relevant Pontrjagin class is

Since , we have . This is written as a matrix identity,

11.4.3 Hirzebruch -polynomial and -genus

The Hirzebruch -polynomial is defined by

where the are Bernoulli numbers, see (11.66). The function is even in and can be written in terms of the Pontrjagin classes,

where stands for . From the splitting principle, we find that

The ( -roof) genus is defined by

This is an even function of and can be expanded in . is also called the Dirac genus by physicists. It satisfies

is written in terms of the Pontrjagin classes as

Let be a compact connected and orientable four-dimensional manifold. Let us consider the symmetric bilinear form defined by

is a symmetric matrix where is the Betti number. Clearly is non-degenerate since for any implies . Let be the number of positive (negative) eigenvalues of . The Hirzebruch signature of is

According to the Hirzebruch signature theorem (see section 12.5), this number is also given in terms of the -polynomial as

Endnotes

来源与版本

正文:英文 · OCR 机器稿 · 待校对

核对状态:OCR 机器稿 · 待校对

原书 PDF

来源版本:second-edition-local

来源 PDF SHA-256:fcd24c3371d092a8c699ccf5cf0765462924b6c48412804231076e8084b1940d

OCR 来源 SHA-256:0b6324f01172a3548cd34382e82fd8bfae574602b6b2cfaa357ba96bc2c35478

OCR 产物 SHA-256:bd284aa6ce6a607e7e6a1567a112dba62f93389e2909f7cf539ababd9c1d7204

Footnotes

  1. Although , need not vanish for a matrix . will be used to define the Euler class later. ↩

  2. See proposition 1.3. The definition here differs in phase from that in section 1.5. It turns out to be convenient to choose the present phase convention in the definition of the Euler class. ↩

  3. Since , we have . Here the plus sign should be chosen since . ↩