11.3 Distributions

Concept links · terms present in this machine draft; source roles are unverified: linear map

While the use of the subspace as state space gives a well-behaved momentum operator and a formalism symmetric between positions and momenta, it still has the problem that eigenfunctions of are not in the state space. Another problem is that, unlike the case of where the Riesz representation theorem provides an isomorphism between this space and its dual just like in the finite dimensional case (see 4.3), such a duality no longer holds for

For a space dual to one can take the space of linear functionals on called the Schwartz space of tempered distributions (a certain continuity condition on the functionals is needed, see for instance [89]), which is denoted by . An element of this space is a linear map

can be identified with a subspace of , by taking to the linear functional given by

Note that taking to is a complex linear map.

There are however elements of that are not of this form, with three important examples

• The linear functional that takes a function to its Fourier transform at k:

• The linear functional that takes a function to its value at

• The linear functional that takes a function to the value of its derivative at

We would like to think of these as “generalized functions”, corresponding to given by the integral in equation 11.8, for some which is a generalization of a function.

From the formula 11.3 for the Fourier transform we have

so the first of the above linear functionals corresponds to

which is a function, but “generalized” in the sense that it is not in (or even in ). This is an eigenfunction for the operator and we see that such eigenfunctions, while not in or , do have a meaning as elements of .

The second linear functional described above can be written as with the corresponding generalized function the “-function”, denoted by the symbol , which is taken to have the property that

is manipulated in some ways like a function, although such a function does not exist. It can however be made sense of as a limit of actual functions. Consider the limit as of functions

These satisfy

for all (using equation 11.6).

Heuristically (ignoring problems of interchange of integrals that don’t make sense), the Fourier inversion formula can be written as follows

Physicists interpret the above calculation as justifying the formula

and then go on to consider the eigenvectors

of the momentum operator as satisfying a replacement for the Fourier series orthonormality relation (equation 11.1), with the -function replacing the :

来源与版本

正文:英文 · OCR 机器稿 · 待校对

核对状态:OCR 机器稿 · 待校对

原书 PDF · 印刷页 129、130、131、132、133、134、135、136、137、138、139、140、141、142

来源版本:2025-10-20

来源 PDF SHA-256:5a1941b2443b54d5db3d055f1e5ba390429b7a728475258017aaac87ee85a837

OCR 来源 SHA-256:bc426eea334bc7f660bbf661b1ce699e6a3d4ea2d2447e31eb6c016434b2288e

OCR 产物 SHA-256:bc426eea334bc7f660bbf661b1ce699e6a3d4ea2d2447e31eb6c016434b2288e