8.2 Representations of SU(2) : construction
Concept links · terms present in this machine draft; source roles are unverified: vector space · complex inner product · eigenvalue · Lie algebra · Lie algebra representation · irreducible representation · Lie group
The argument of the previous section only tells us what properties possible finite dimensional irreducible representations of must have. It shows how to construct such representations given a highest weight vector, but does not provide any way to construct such highest weight vectors. We would like to find some method to explicitly construct an irreducible for each highest weight There are several possible constructions, but perhaps the simplest one is the following, which gives a representation of highest weight by looking at polynomials in two complex variables, homogeneous of degree . This construction will produce representations not just of , but of the larger group
Recall from equation 1.3 that if one has an action of a group on a space , one can get a representation on functions on by taking
For the group , we have by definition an action on , and we look at a specific class of functions on this space, the polynomials. We can break up the infinite dimensional space of polynomials on into finite dimensional subspaces as follows:
Definition (Homogeneous polynomials)
The complex vector space of homogeneous polynomials of degree in two complex variables is the space of functions on of the form
The space of such functions is a complex vector space of dimension
This space of functions is exactly the representation space that we need to get the spin irreducible representation of
If we choose a basis of , then we can write as the matrix
The coordinates will be the dual basis of the linear functions on and (see the discussion at the end of sections 4.1 and 4.2) g will act on them by
The representation on homogeneous polynomial functions will be given by this action on the in the expression for the polynomial.
Taking the derivative, the Lie algebra representation is given by
where is any 2 by 2 complex matrix. By the chain rule, for
this is
where the are the components of the matrix .
Computing what happens for (a basis of su(2), we get
so
and similarly
The for are eigenvectors for with eigenvalue since
will be an explicit highest weight vector for the representation
An important thing to note here is that the formulas we have found for are not in terms of matrices. Instead we have seen that when we construct our representations using functions on , for any is given by a diferential operator. These diferential operators are independent of with the same operator on all the . This is because the original definition of the representation
is on the full infinite dimensional space of polynomials on . While this space is infinite dimensional, issues of analysis don’t really come into play here, since polynomial functions are essentially an algebraic construction.
Restricting the diferential operators to , the homogeneous polynomials of degree they become linear operators on a finite dimensional space. We now have an explicit highest weight vector, and an explicit construction of the corresponding irreducible representation. If one chooses a basis of then the linear operator will be given by a + 1 by matrix. Clearly though, the expression as a simple first-order diferential operator is much easier to work with. In the examples we will be studying in later chapters, the representations under consideration will often be on function spaces, with Lie algebra representations appearing as diferential operators. Instead of using linear algebra techniques find eigenvalues and eigenvectors, the eigenvector equation will be a partial diferential equation, with our focus on using Lie groups and their representation theory to solve such equations.
One issue we haven’t addressed yet is that of unitarity of the representation. We need Hermitian inner products on the spaces , inner products that will be preserved by the action of that we have defined on these spaces. A standard way to define a Hermitian inner product on functions on a space is to define them using an integral: for complex-valued functions on , take their inner product to be
While for this gives an invariant inner product on functions (one that is not invariant for the full group , it is useless for polynomial, since such integrals diverge. In this case an inner product on polynomial functions on can be defined by
Here . Integrals of this kind can be done fairly easily since they factorize into separate integrals over and , each of which can be treated using polar coordinates and standard calculus methods. One can check by explicit computation that the polynomials
will be an orthonormal basis of the space of polynomial functions with respect to this inner product, and the operators will be skew-adjoint.
Working out what happens for the first few examples of irreducible representations, one finds orthonormal bases for the representation spaces of homogeneous polynomials as follows
• For = 2, = 1
• For = 3, = 32
来源与版本
正文:英文 · OCR 机器稿 · 待校对
核对状态:OCR 机器稿 · 待校对
原书 PDF · 印刷页 89、90、91、92、93、94、95、96、97、98、99、100、101、102、103、104、105、106、107、108
来源版本:2025-10-20
来源 PDF SHA-256:5a1941b2443b54d5db3d055f1e5ba390429b7a728475258017aaac87ee85a837
OCR 来源 SHA-256:f30e5e19104ce525fa7316f25353a05960c606085ccb5d251e1897c8bfa8c58c
OCR 产物 SHA-256:f30e5e19104ce525fa7316f25353a05960c606085ccb5d251e1897c8bfa8c58c