42.2 Irreducible representations of the Poincar´e group
Concept links · terms present in this machine draft; source roles are unverified: eigenvalue · Lie algebra · Lie algebra representation · group representation · irreducible representation · Hilbert space · group action · Schur’s lemma
We would like to construct unitary irreducible representations of the Poincar´e group. These will be given by unitary operators on a Hilbert space which will have an interpretation as a single-particle relativistic quantum state space. In the analogous non-relativistic case, we constructed unitary irreducible representations of (or its double cover as
• The space of wavefunctions of a free particle of mass with a fixed energy (chapter 19). These are solutions to
where
and the are single-component wavefunctions. acts on wavefunctions by
• The space of solutions of the “square root” of the Pauli-Schr¨odinger equation (see section 34.2). These are solutions to
where
and the are two-component wavefunctions. acts on wavefunctions by
(where is the element corresponding to in the double cover).
In both cases, the group action commutes with the diferential operator, or equivalently one has and this is what ensures that the operators take solutions to solutions.
To construct representations of we would like to generalize this construction from to Minkowski space . To do this, one begins by defining an action of on -component wavefunctions by
This is the action one gets by identifying n-component wavefunctions with
and using the induced action on functions for the first factor in the tensor product, on the second factor taking to be an n dimensional representation of the Lorentz group.
One then chooses a diferential operator on -component wavefunctions, one that commutes with the group action, so
The then give a representation of on the space of solutions to the wave equation
for c a constant, and in some cases this will give an irreducible representation. If the space of solutions is not irreducible an additional set of “subsidiary conditions” can be used to pick out a subspace of solutions on which the representation is irreducible. In later chapters we will consider several examples of this construction, but now will turn to the general classification of representations of .
Recall that in the case we had two Casimir operators:
and
Here is the representation operator for Lie algebra representation, corresponding to an infinitesimal translation in the j-direction. is the operator for an infinitesimal rotation about the j-axis. The Lie algebra commutation relations of ensure that these two operators commute with the action of and thus, by Schur’s lemma, act as a scalar on an irreducible representation. Note that the fact that the first Casimir operator is a diferential operator in position space and commutes with the action means that the eigenvalue equation
has a space of solutions that is a representation, and potentially irreducible. In the Poincar´e group case, we can easily identify:
Definition (Casimir operator)
The Casimir (or first Casimir) operator for the Poincar´e group is the operator
A straightforward calculation using the Poincar´e Lie algebra commutation relations shows that is a Casimir operator since one has
for . Here is a Lie algebra representation operator corresponding to the , and the operator corresponding to
The second Casimir operator is more dificult to identify in the Poincar´e case than in the case. To find it, first define:
Definition (Pauli-Lubanski operator)
The Pauli-Lubanski operator is the fourcomponent operator
By use of the commutation relations, one can show that the components of behave like a four-vector, .e.,
and the commutation relations with the and are the same for as for . One can then define:
Definition (Second Casimir operator)
The second Casimir operator for the Poincar´e Lie algebra is
Use of the commutation relations shows that
so is a Casimir operator.
To classify Poincar´e group representations, we have two tools available. We can use the two Casimir operators and and characterize irreducible representations by their eigenvalues. In addition, recall from chapter 20 that irreducible representations of semi-direct products are associated with pairs of a K-orbit for , and an irreducible representation of the corresponding little group
For the Poincar´e group, is the space of characters (one dimensional representations) of the translation group of Minkowski space. Elements are labeled by
where the are the eigenvalues of the energy-momentum operators . For representations on wavefunctions, these eigenvalues will correspond to elements in the representation space with space-time dependence.
Given an irreducible representation, the operator will act by the scalar
which can be positive, negative, or zero, so given by for various m. The value of the scalar will be the same everywhere on the orbit, so in energy-momentum space, orbits will satisfy one of the three equations
The representation can be further characterized in one of two ways:
• By the value of the second Casimir operator
• By the representation of the stabilizer group on the eigenspace of the momentum operators with eigenvalue
At the point on an orbit, the Pauli-Lubanski operator has components
In the next chapter we will find the possible orbits, then pick a point on each orbit, and see what the stabilizer group and Pauli-Lubanski operator are at that point.
来源与版本
正文:英文 · OCR 机器稿 · 待校对
核对状态:OCR 机器稿 · 待校对
原书 PDF · 印刷页 444、445、446、447、448、449、450、451、452、453、454、455
来源版本:2025-10-20
来源 PDF SHA-256:5a1941b2443b54d5db3d055f1e5ba390429b7a728475258017aaac87ee85a837
OCR 来源 SHA-256:77b4da6c2272b606e953ece8669bd1810946873c05ecfe49ade61de273a7678a
OCR 产物 SHA-256:77b4da6c2272b606e953ece8669bd1810946873c05ecfe49ade61de273a7678a